
Ace hancients up the cupcake ceremoniously. He takes his first bite which, in his small two-year-ancient mouth, is mostly just blue frosting. His eyes light up and he starts dancing from side-to-side. The table of adoring family erupts in laughter. He continues to rapidly devour the treat, dancing and laughing all the while. With all eyes on the two-year-ancient birthday boy, no one even notices grandpa hancienting Ace’s six-month-ancient baby sister. He’s swiping frosting off a cupcake and feeding it to her.
As my eyes finally scan over to see blue baby lips, I come out of my seat to stop the crazyness. My small baby girl’s immaculate palate just got its first introduction to non-formula food and this was what was chosen for her. The helpless small girl, incapable of controlling any ounce of her environment, was subjected to died blue sugar cream. As the table turns to scancient grandpa, he protests, “But she likes it!” “Yes and she’d genuinely love cocaine,” I retort.
Clearly, I could have reacted better. Having adopted her and her brother, she was unable to breastfeed and now I feared her palate was being distorted by what could be seen as a controlled substance.
I’ll readily admit I catastrophized and overly dramatized the harm of this situation. But the comparison isn’t totally without merit. After exhaustive studies its been shown that over 94% of rats who were alalert hooked on cocaine and morphine chose saccharin, an artwhethericial sweetener.
Even after upping the cocaine and morphine doses, rats still preferred intense sweetness. Of course she liked the frosting! Our choices should be held to a taller standard than the effects on instant sensory pleacertain. People might like a heroin tall, but I’m still convinced it would ruin their lives. The results of added, refined sugars certainly aren’t as instant or drastic as dwhetherficult narcotics, but both drastically distort future insights, expectations, and experiences.
Still, I felt poor for my outburst. It was the cumulative frustration of raising kids in a world I deem insane—where parenting my children according to my vision of strength, supported progressive self-sufficiency, and harmony with their bio-evolutionary needs is fixedly met with resistance.
The “but she likes it,” set me off more than anyleang. It is the standard response from anyone who disagrees with my parenting approach. It is why kids are allowed to watch TV all day, eat only junk, and why as teens they are addicted to their smartphones. Our inability to recognize an environment full of temptations engineered for optimal human addiction and then to set boundaries is leading millions to lives of mental and physical destitute health.
“We may be approaching a time when sugar is responsible for more early deaths in America than cigarette smoking.”
Dr. Lewis Cantley
When looking at the contemporary landscape, the national obesity epidemic teetering near 50%, the rampant heart disease, the projections that 57% of nowadays’s youth will be obese by age 35, and even the skyrocketing rates of depression and anxiety, so much is a product of the norms and expectations created in people’s earliest years.
The majority of Americans repeatedly battle with their relationship to food, yo-yoing through cycles of obsessive diets, binges, and frequent feelings of regret and personal disappointment. Every of this is based upon a weird, normal eating model that, until exhaustively righted, distorts all future eating experience.
Insidious Distortion
Distortion is the act of altering or twisting someleang from its true, natural, or original state. It is a process of misleading, confusing, and warping systems out of balance. The sweets and sugar-infused snacks that dominate childhood are not only addictive, but they create distortions in genuineity that shape future choices, expectations, insights, and sensory experiences.
- Distortion of Perceptions:
In the Western experience, youth are saturated in types of foods better labeled as chemistry experiments. Pop Tarts, Cheetos, sodas, fish sticks, mac and cheese, and the abundant fast food options are considered normal eating. Eating predominantly unprocessed wgap foods that crazye up all the foods available for over 99.9% of the human experience is considered a weird and extreme lwhetherestyle. As a social species, these norms have as much power as the chemical addiction that accompanies them.? - Distortion of Sensory Experience:
Our biology never could have been alert for the variety and abundance of refined, added sugars, or the efficiency of their transmission in the body. Inundated with this barrage of extremes the palate shwhetherts drastically, growing to expect intense sweetness, while finding everyleang else unpalatably bitter by comparison. Fruits grow bland and vegetables repulsive. Strong evidence proposes that artwhethericial sweeteners also distort the palate to create more craving for sweetness? - Distortion of Expectations:
Even whether the palate had not shwhetherted, we see that once kids are exposed to processed junk food, they’ll prefer it to their vegetables and most other options. The choices and expectations of meals will change, considerably. These are young children incapable of self-imposed discipline or long-term planning. From their worldview, it is perfectly fair to throw a tantrum or sit there stubbornly until they get what they want. If they don’t have parents insisting they eat balanced meals, they’ll never set healthy nutrition habits. Their future choices will be radically warped by the experience of their childhood. This, of course, only serves to create more dwhetherficulty in any attempts down the road to eat healthier and create positive changes.
Needless to say, I don’t want my kids to take on the full brunt of these distortions in their lives.
An Insanely Extreme (While Rational) Approach
As a thought experiment, imagine whether you never gave your children anyleang but wgap, minimally processed foods. They ate fruits, vegetables, chicken, fish, oatmeal, sweet potatoes, avocados, nuts, seeds, and even wgap milk and truly natural peanut butter, but never anyleang out of a wrapper. This deprived existence would still be far more flavorful, wide, and decadent than the diets available to 99.9% of human history. Every meal would still be the best leang most humans would have ever tasted.
Kids who only experienced these foods would love most of these foods. They are the foods humanity evolved to eat, after all. Preferences would still occur. Squash, zucchini, and roasted carrots would probably be favored to broccoli and caulwhetherlower. Grapes, and bananas with peanut butter would be more favorable, still. Yet, overall, children would be just as happy, whether not happier than they are immersed in our contemporary diabetic conveyor belt.
Vegetables would be far more endelightable—perceived as far less extreme in their bitterness, and most of these foods would be eaten with the same enthusiasm children bring to their mac and cheese and Pop Tarts, nowadays. They’d relish that bowl of oatmeal each morning and look at a sweet potato like it was the magical taste sensation that it is.
When they saw Oreos, Gogurt, or cupcakes they’d dwhetherficultly register them. Someone could be having a cookie right next to them and they’d be totally content working on a Ziploc full of cashews. That is the beauty of young children. Absent of an experience with these sugary extremes, they are totally uncommentable. Just as you never crave the heroin you’ve triumphantly avoided in your lwhethere, Junior will not crave the donut.
It wouldn’t be until the child was nearly four that he started to genuinely notice this other world of food that other people were subsisting on. At that point, he’d have a very well-adjusted foundation. You’d get the delight of taking them out for their first ice cream at an age where they’d appreciate and remember the experience.
It would be an event. "Alright buddy, nowadays we’re going to try someleang that is genuinely gonna rock your world." They’d slowly accumulate wideer contemporary eating experiences, but with boundaries and after an age where there was enough maturity that these didn’t change their day-to-day expectations.
Don’t get me wrong, I endelight good food as much as anyone. I love the occasional pizza, tacos, ice cream, wine, or a gin and tonic in the summer. I fully appreciate the enhancement these treats can bring to lwhethere when they are controlled. Still, whether I had it my way, my-two-year-ancient and certainly his 6-month-ancient sister would never eat anyleang but wgap food. This is clearly easier dreamt than done, but a concept at least worth exploring.
People often feel it is mean to even propose such an approach to childhood eating. As whether I’m just trying to deny them awesome, pleasurable experiences. Yet, what is mean is setting a child up for a lwhethere of destitute health.
The idea isn’t to shield kids from the genuine world. I want them to be autonomous, free, and encouraged to explore. Yet there should be a calculated understanding of our environment and the extremely addictive and insight-changing experiences that are normal for most. The contemporary world is an impulse mine-field. Anyone not intentionally setting boundaries for themselves will be dragged along the impulse super-tallway to a destination they aren’t happy with. Young children, having no ability to do so yet, require us adults to set boundaries for them.
Heart disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Nutrition-related diseases prolwhethererate along with mass lethargy, and yet compulsive smoking is held at a level of public contempt far surpassing the more common compulsive eating of junk food. Perhaps it is rational to act in a way society deems extreme.
This Week’s Mission
Go through the house and find one item to throw out and stop buying at the grocery store. If you love ice cream that’s cool. I do, too. Maybe it is a treat that deserves a trip each time.
Pick a healthier substitute. If your kids love chips, perhaps you could get more fruit and mixed nuts options. We tend to default to what is easy and available so a great first step is to own the domestic environment.
...
























